New Authority with close-knitted control?
Some are afraid that a network like GOL might turn just into another authority. Social control could even become worse, due to mutual dependences arising soon. Everybody gets worked into some groups, who will try to rule everything.
Will their be left any room to breath and think on one's own?
I admit that such tendencies might occur at the start, but I suppose they will grind to a halt rather soon. Only such rules can climb the levels, which are of vital significance to big majorities. Anything else will get stuck right in the beginning, cause there are more important things to do.... moreNew Authority with close-knitted control?
Some are afraid that a network like GOL might turn just into another authority. Social control could even become worse, due to mutual dependences arising soon. Everybody gets worked into some groups, who will try to rule everything.
Will their be left any room to breath and think on one's own?
I admit that such tendencies might occur at the start, but I suppose they will grind to a halt rather soon. Only such rules can climb the levels, which are of vital significance to big majorities. Anything else will get stuck right in the beginning, cause there are more important things to do.
How are unpleasant speakers getting on?
They soon will be voted out of office. If doubted speakers collected many supporters, or brought along many adherents, then disagreeable groups will get deserted before long. Since the groups are only build virtually in the network, no one needs to change his living or working place to get free again for joining a better group.
I think, other, more rel... less
Is UsRulingUs ineffective?
If we think, that all legal activities on principle will stay without any effect, then we must consider UsRulingUs as being useless and negligible. In this case, we are looking at the present circumstances as a superiority, using its laws and executive bodies as a bunker. We will not see a real chance to bring in, or to put through our requests and concerns. We will stop in front of the bunker to stare at it, being unaware of our own power.
UsRulingUs proceeds in another way. Wether or not power will bunker itself, this shall be left to power's own resources. History is not made by rulers, neither by ruling theories of knowledge, ideologies, schools of thinking, or other drifts of judgement-power, but it's made by the masses' actual way of life. Leo Tolstoi was the first one to realize this, when he researched on Napoleon's expedition against Russia. Nowadays this insight almost goes without saying.
Internet itself is an eloquent example. It turned to a part of the way of life, life w... ... moreIs UsRulingUs ineffective?
If we think, that all legal activities on principle will stay without any effect, then we must consider UsRulingUs as being useless and negligible. In this case, we are looking at the present circumstances as a superiority, using its laws and executive bodies as a bunker. We will not see a real chance to bring in, or to put through our requests and concerns. We will stop in front of the bunker to stare at it, being unaware of our own power.
UsRulingUs proceeds in another way. Wether or not power will bunker itself, this shall be left to power's own resources. History is not made by rulers, neither by ruling theories of knowledge, ideologies, schools of thinking, or other drifts of judgement-power, but it's made by the masses' actual way of life. Leo Tolstoi was the first one to realize this, when he researched on Napoleon's expedition against Russia. Nowadays this insight almost goes without saying.
Internet itself is an eloquent example. It turned to a part of the way of life, life w... less
A GOL-Bank is a combination of a barter-bank and a development fund.
What's the difference to a traditional barter-bank?
Usually a barter bank will only arrange bartering of commodities already produced, in exchange to existing goods, or to services on demand.
A GOL-Bank shall expand this activities to future production and trade. It shall plan, what commodities and services will be exchanged according to a bargain or contract. This way production and trade both become arranged, managed in advance, before they start. A locally planned economy of the contract partners will arise. ... moreA GOL-Bank is a combination of a barter-bank and a development fund.
What's the difference to a traditional barter-bank?
Usually a barter bank will only arrange bartering of commodities already produced, in exchange to existing goods, or to services on demand.
A GOL-Bank shall expand this activities to future production and trade. It shall plan, what commodities and services will be exchanged according to a bargain or contract. This way production and trade both become arranged, managed in advance, before they start. A locally planned economy of the contract partners will arise.
But a planned economy will probably fail?
If it was planned on a national scale, it most likely would fail, because a national economy is too complex. Even if it worked, it would become isolated and backward. But I think, on a local or regional scale a planned economy can help a lot, it can achieve a common subsistence, while coexisting with capitalism.
A locally planned economy can start on a small scale, where the partners know eac... less
Secret Services reading with us?
Not only journalists and personnel managers brows the net as they like it, but also secret services as well, all of them will read along with us, if not supposing or realizing irrelevance. It's nothing to be surprised about, since secret services are made for these purposes. A secret service has to trace out public enemies, inside and outside the country, and simply has to eliminate them. Internet only makes this more simply.
Wether or not CIA & Co will respect according laws in doing so, no thriller will teach us, but history. Secret services possibly think to be protecting higher values than law, or that justice should become adapted to their special needs and activities on time. In this case, again secret services possibly seem to be right, as history tells us, because they are provided with special laws for the nation's safety, while their agenda anyway is imposed to military secrecy all the time.
Social networks, mobil-telefons, email-accounts, websites, all of these are op... ... moreSecret Services reading with us?
Not only journalists and personnel managers brows the net as they like it, but also secret services as well, all of them will read along with us, if not supposing or realizing irrelevance. It's nothing to be surprised about, since secret services are made for these purposes. A secret service has to trace out public enemies, inside and outside the country, and simply has to eliminate them. Internet only makes this more simply.
Wether or not CIA & Co will respect according laws in doing so, no thriller will teach us, but history. Secret services possibly think to be protecting higher values than law, or that justice should become adapted to their special needs and activities on time. In this case, again secret services possibly seem to be right, as history tells us, because they are provided with special laws for the nation's safety, while their agenda anyway is imposed to military secrecy all the time.
Social networks, mobil-telefons, email-accounts, websites, all of these are op... less
Is Level-Democracy a Pyramid Scheme?
The purpose of a pyramid scheme is just money, but in no way it's „making“ money, instead, it's merely taking it away from others. Every player needs to recruit new players, who are to refund his financial input. The system breaks down, as soon as no more new players are found to get involved. Still, this must happen, since the number of reachable inhabitants of this world is limitted. Any pyramid scheme is fraud and justly prohibited.
The purpose of level-democracy is not money, but a new way of living. Only votes, guts and voices need to be invested, which is necessary in every democracy. Who wants to be heard, must speak. Once all of this world's voices are collected, the system will not break down, but instead of, it will have become ordinary, every day life, and indeed a very conscious way of living. At that time, our way of living will be the one that was intended, decided by a majority of our votes.
Still, the system of level-democracy will not end for this... ... moreIs Level-Democracy a Pyramid Scheme?
The purpose of a pyramid scheme is just money, but in no way it's „making“ money, instead, it's merely taking it away from others. Every player needs to recruit new players, who are to refund his financial input. The system breaks down, as soon as no more new players are found to get involved. Still, this must happen, since the number of reachable inhabitants of this world is limitted. Any pyramid scheme is fraud and justly prohibited.
The purpose of level-democracy is not money, but a new way of living. Only votes, guts and voices need to be invested, which is necessary in every democracy. Who wants to be heard, must speak. Once all of this world's voices are collected, the system will not break down, but instead of, it will have become ordinary, every day life, and indeed a very conscious way of living. At that time, our way of living will be the one that was intended, decided by a majority of our votes.
Still, the system of level-democracy will not end for this... less
New Authority with close-knitted control?
Some are afraid that a network like GOL might turn just into another authority. Social control could even become worse, due to mutual dependences arising soon. Everybody gets worked into some groups, who will try to rule everything.
Will their be left any room to breath and think on one's own?
I admit that such tendencies might occur at the start, but I suppose they will grind to a halt rather soon. Only such rules can climb the levels, which are of vital significance to big majorities. Anything else will get stuck right in the beginning, cause there are more important things to do.... moreNew Authority with close-knitted control?
Some are afraid that a network like GOL might turn just into another authority. Social control could even become worse, due to mutual dependences arising soon. Everybody gets worked into some groups, who will try to rule everything.
Will their be left any room to breath and think on one's own?
I admit that such tendencies might occur at the start, but I suppose they will grind to a halt rather soon. Only such rules can climb the levels, which are of vital significance to big majorities. Anything else will get stuck right in the beginning, cause there are more important things to do.
How are unpleasant speakers getting on?
They soon will be voted out of office. If doubted speakers collected many supporters, or brought along many adherents, then disagreeable groups will get deserted before long. Since the groups are only build virtually in the network, no one needs to change his living or working place to get free again for joining a better group.
I think, other, more rel... less
Is UsRulingUs ineffective?
If we think, that all legal activities on principle will stay without any effect, then we must consider UsRulingUs as being useless and negligible. In this case, we are looking at the present circumstances as a superiority, using its laws and executive bodies as a bunker. We will not see a real chance to bring in, or to put through our requests and concerns. We will stop in front of the bunker to stare at it, being unaware of our own power.
UsRulingUs proceeds in another way. Wether or not power will bunker itself, this shall be left to power's own resources. History is not made by rulers, neither by ruling theories of knowledge, ideologies, schools of thinking, or other drifts of judgement-power, but it's made by the masses' actual way of life. Leo Tolstoi was the first one to realize this, when he researched on Napoleon's expedition against Russia. Nowadays this insight almost goes without saying.
Internet itself is an eloquent example. It turned to a part of the way of life, life w... ... moreIs UsRulingUs ineffective?
If we think, that all legal activities on principle will stay without any effect, then we must consider UsRulingUs as being useless and negligible. In this case, we are looking at the present circumstances as a superiority, using its laws and executive bodies as a bunker. We will not see a real chance to bring in, or to put through our requests and concerns. We will stop in front of the bunker to stare at it, being unaware of our own power.
UsRulingUs proceeds in another way. Wether or not power will bunker itself, this shall be left to power's own resources. History is not made by rulers, neither by ruling theories of knowledge, ideologies, schools of thinking, or other drifts of judgement-power, but it's made by the masses' actual way of life. Leo Tolstoi was the first one to realize this, when he researched on Napoleon's expedition against Russia. Nowadays this insight almost goes without saying.
Internet itself is an eloquent example. It turned to a part of the way of life, life w... less
A GOL-Bank is a combination of a barter-bank and a development fund.
What's the difference to a traditional barter-bank?
Usually a barter bank will only arrange bartering of commodities already produced, in exchange to existing goods, or to services on demand.
A GOL-Bank shall expand this activities to future production and trade. It shall plan, what commodities and services will be exchanged according to a bargain or contract. This way production and trade both become arranged, managed in advance, before they start. A locally planned economy of the contract partners will arise. ... moreA GOL-Bank is a combination of a barter-bank and a development fund.
What's the difference to a traditional barter-bank?
Usually a barter bank will only arrange bartering of commodities already produced, in exchange to existing goods, or to services on demand.
A GOL-Bank shall expand this activities to future production and trade. It shall plan, what commodities and services will be exchanged according to a bargain or contract. This way production and trade both become arranged, managed in advance, before they start. A locally planned economy of the contract partners will arise.
But a planned economy will probably fail?
If it was planned on a national scale, it most likely would fail, because a national economy is too complex. Even if it worked, it would become isolated and backward. But I think, on a local or regional scale a planned economy can help a lot, it can achieve a common subsistence, while coexisting with capitalism.
A locally planned economy can start on a small scale, where the partners know eac... less
Secret Services reading with us?
Not only journalists and personnel managers brows the net as they like it, but also secret services as well, all of them will read along with us, if not supposing or realizing irrelevance. It's nothing to be surprised about, since secret services are made for these purposes. A secret service has to trace out public enemies, inside and outside the country, and simply has to eliminate them. Internet only makes this more simply.
Wether or not CIA & Co will respect according laws in doing so, no thriller will teach us, but history. Secret services possibly think to be protecting higher values than law, or that justice should become adapted to their special needs and activities on time. In this case, again secret services possibly seem to be right, as history tells us, because they are provided with special laws for the nation's safety, while their agenda anyway is imposed to military secrecy all the time.
Social networks, mobil-telefons, email-accounts, websites, all of these are op... ... moreSecret Services reading with us?
Not only journalists and personnel managers brows the net as they like it, but also secret services as well, all of them will read along with us, if not supposing or realizing irrelevance. It's nothing to be surprised about, since secret services are made for these purposes. A secret service has to trace out public enemies, inside and outside the country, and simply has to eliminate them. Internet only makes this more simply.
Wether or not CIA & Co will respect according laws in doing so, no thriller will teach us, but history. Secret services possibly think to be protecting higher values than law, or that justice should become adapted to their special needs and activities on time. In this case, again secret services possibly seem to be right, as history tells us, because they are provided with special laws for the nation's safety, while their agenda anyway is imposed to military secrecy all the time.
Social networks, mobil-telefons, email-accounts, websites, all of these are op... less
Is Level-Democracy a Pyramid Scheme?
The purpose of a pyramid scheme is just money, but in no way it's „making“ money, instead, it's merely taking it away from others. Every player needs to recruit new players, who are to refund his financial input. The system breaks down, as soon as no more new players are found to get involved. Still, this must happen, since the number of reachable inhabitants of this world is limitted. Any pyramid scheme is fraud and justly prohibited.
The purpose of level-democracy is not money, but a new way of living. Only votes, guts and voices need to be invested, which is necessary in every democracy. Who wants to be heard, must speak. Once all of this world's voices are collected, the system will not break down, but instead of, it will have become ordinary, every day life, and indeed a very conscious way of living. At that time, our way of living will be the one that was intended, decided by a majority of our votes.
Still, the system of level-democracy will not end for this... ... moreIs Level-Democracy a Pyramid Scheme?
The purpose of a pyramid scheme is just money, but in no way it's „making“ money, instead, it's merely taking it away from others. Every player needs to recruit new players, who are to refund his financial input. The system breaks down, as soon as no more new players are found to get involved. Still, this must happen, since the number of reachable inhabitants of this world is limitted. Any pyramid scheme is fraud and justly prohibited.
The purpose of level-democracy is not money, but a new way of living. Only votes, guts and voices need to be invested, which is necessary in every democracy. Who wants to be heard, must speak. Once all of this world's voices are collected, the system will not break down, but instead of, it will have become ordinary, every day life, and indeed a very conscious way of living. At that time, our way of living will be the one that was intended, decided by a majority of our votes.
Still, the system of level-democracy will not end for this... less
